Autocratic leadership is a term that often evokes images of a stern and unyielding boss bellowing orders down from high. But there is more to this style of management than meets the eye. While it is true that autocratic leaders tend to rely on unquestioned authority and strict control, they also have their share of advantages in certain situations. This article will examine the pros and cons of autocratic leadership, explore real-life examples of how it works in practice, and consider alternatives to this approach. Whether you are a manager looking for ways to lead more effectively or just curious about different leadership styles, keep reading!
- Autocratic leadership offers quick decision-making and the ability to maintain control but may lack creativity and employee engagement.
- It is important to consider alternative leadership styles, such as democratic or laissez-faire, depending on the situation and goals.
- Autocratic leadership can be effective when speed is crucial, but its limitations should be carefully weighed, and leaders should remain open-minded to different approaches for optimal team management.
What is autocratic leadership?
Autocratic leadership is a style of management where the leader makes all the decisions and enforces them with strict control (Wang et al., 2019). In this type of leadership, there is little or no input from team members, who are expected to follow orders without questioning them (Nordbäck & Espinosa, 2019). This approach can be effective in certain emergencies or crises requiring quick decision-making (Mizrahi et al., 2021). Autocratic leaders also tend to be highly confident and decisive, which can inspire trust and respect among their followers (Zheng et al., 2021).
However, autocratic leadership can also have its downsides. Stifling creativity and ignoring team members’ input may lead to resentment and low morale. This style of management may also result in a lack of innovation or growth within an organization because new ideas are not being shared or explored (Young, 2020).
In practice, autocratic leaders often use fear-based tactics to maintain control over their teams, which may create a toxic work environment. While autocratic leadership can be helpful in some circumstances, leaders need to recognize when to employ other approaches that prioritize collaboration and empowerment over authoritarianism (Irving et al., 2019).
Pros of autocratic leadership
Autocratic leadership has its fair share of advantages that make it appealing to certain individuals and organizations. One of the main pros of autocratic leadership is that it allows for quick decision-making without having to go through a lengthy process of consulting with others. This leadership style can be beneficial when time is limited, such as during an emergency or crisis (Gumusluoglu et al., 2020). Another advantage of autocratic leadership is its clear direction and structure within the organization. With a strong leader at the helm, employees are aware of their roles and responsibilities, which helps streamline processes and ensures everyone is working towards common goals (Mansaray, 2019). In addition, autocratic leaders often possess a great deal of expertise in their field, which makes them well-suited to lead their teams effectively. They also tend to be highly motivated individuals who set high standards for themselves and those around them (DuBrin, 2022). One final benefit worth mentioning is that autocratic leaders are often able to maintain control over challenging situations due to their assertiveness and unwavering confidence. This can help prevent chaos from ensuing during times when tensions may run high (Bigland et al., 2020).
While there are certainly some benefits associated with this type of leadership style, it is important to recognize that it is not always appropriate for every situation or organization (Ciulla & Ciulla, 2020). In order to determine whether or not autocratic leadership is right for your business, careful consideration should be given before making any hasty decisions (Mansaray, 2019).
Cons of autocratic leadership
Autocratic leadership has its share of disadvantages despite being an effective style in certain situations. One major drawback is that it discourages employee creativity and innovation. Since leaders make all the decisions without input from their team members, they may miss valuable insights and suggestions (Briker et al., 2021).
Another significant disadvantage is that autocratic leadership can foster resentment among employees. When workers feel undervalued or unappreciated, they become demotivated, leading to lower productivity levels and a decline in overall morale (Justino, 2022).
Furthermore, autocratic leaders tend to rely heavily on punishment and coercion to maintain control over their subordinates. This approach often leads to feelings of fear and anxiety among employees instead of respect or loyalty toward their leader (Li et al., 2021). Moreover, since decisions are made solely by the leader without consultation with others, there’s always a risk of poor decision-making and an increased chance for mistakes (Akwilin, 2020).
Autocratic leaders often fail to develop future leaders within their teams because they do not delegate tasks or allow them to take ownership of projects. Consequently, when these individuals leave the organization due to retirement or other reasons, there will be a lack of capable replacements ready to take their place (Mansaray, 2019).
Autocratic leadership in action
Autocratic leadership in action involves the leader holding all of the decision-making power and taking a commanding approach to managing their team. The autocrat issues orders and expects immediate compliance without question or feedback from subordinates (Akparobore & Omosekejimi, 2020). In some situations, autocratic leadership can be effective. For example, an autocratic leader may be necessary during a crisis where quick decisions are needed to ensure safety. (Caillier, 2020). However, this type of leadership style can also lead to poor morale among team members who feel undervalued and disempowered. Autocrats often micromanage their teams to ensure everything is done according to their specifications (Du et al., 2020). This level of control can stifle creativity and innovation among team members who may have valuable insights into how best to complete tasks or solve problems.
Additionally, under an autocratic leader, there is little room for personal growth or development as the focus is on following orders rather than gaining new skills or experiences (Zheng et al., 2020). This lack of opportunity for growth could lead talented employees to leave the organization in search of better opportunities. While there may be times when an autocratic approach is necessary, it should not be relied upon as a long-term management strategy due to its potential negative impact on employee morale and organizational culture (Siddique et al., 2020).
Alternatives to autocratic leadership
While autocratic leadership can be effective in certain situations, it may not always be the best approach to leading a team (Chiang et al., 2021). Fortunately, there are several alternatives to this style of leadership that you can consider. One alternative is democratic leadership. In this style, leaders involve their team members in decision-making and encourage collaboration. This allows everyone to have a voice and feel like they are part of the process (Berjaoui & Karami-Akkary, 2020).
Another option is transformational leadership. Leaders who use this approach inspire and motivate their teams through vision-setting and encouragement rather than using fear or force to get results (Schermuly & Meyer, 2020). Servant leadership is another alternative where leaders prioritize serving their team members’ needs before their own. They focus on building relationships with their team members and empowering them to take ownership of tasks (Wu et al., 2021). Coaching-style leadership involves working closely with individual team members to help them develop skills and achieve personal goals while still focusing on achieving overall objectives as a group. There are many different approaches you can take when it comes to leading a team effectively without relying solely on autocratic tactics (Boysen et al., 2021).
Autocratic leadership is a style that has been used in many industries, from politics to business. While it can be effective in certain situations, there are also downsides to this approach. The pros of autocratic leadership include quick decision-making and maintaining control over a project or organization. However, the cons of autocratic leadership include a lack of creativity and employee engagement. It is important to note that autocratic leadership should not be the only option for leading teams or organizations. There are alternative approaches, such as democratic or laissez-faire leadership styles, which may work better depending on the situation. When deciding whether to use an autocratic approach, weighing both the advantages and disadvantages carefully is essential. In general, this style works best when speed is critical, and decisions need to be made quickly without input from others. While autocratic leadership can have its benefits in certain contexts, its limitations must also be considered before choosing this approach for your team or organization. It is vital for leaders to always keep an open mind about different techniques so they can adjust their management style accordingly based on what will work best with their team members and the goals at hand.
Akparobore, D., & Omosekejimi, A. F. (2020). Leadership qualities and style: a panacea for job productivity and effective service delivery among library staff in academic libraries in South South, Nigeria. Library Management, 41(8/9), 677-687.
Akwilin, Y. (2020). The Effect of Managerial Leadership Style on Waitresses’ Work Performance in the Hotel Industry in Tanzania: A Case of Mpanda Star Hotels (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania).
Berjaoui, R. R., & Karami-Akkary, R. (2020). Distributed leadership as a path to organizational commitment: The case of a Lebanese school. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19(4), 610-624.
Bigland, C., Evans, D., Bolden, R., & Rae, M. (2020). Systems leadership in practice: thematic insights from three public health case studies. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1-14.
Boysen, S. M., Arya, T., & Page, L. (2021). Organizational and executive coaching: Creating a coaching culture in a non-profit. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 19(2).
Briker, R., Walter, F., & Cole, M. S. (2021). Hurry up! The role of supervisors’ time urgency and self‐perceived status for autocratic leadership and subordinates’ well‐being. Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 55-76.
Caillier, J. G. (2020). Testing the influence of autocratic leadership, democratic leadership, and public service motivation on citizen ratings of an agency head’s performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4), 918-941.
Chiang, J. T. J., Chen, X. P., Liu, H., Akutsu, S., & Wang, Z. (2021). We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suppression climate, and team performance. Human Relations, 74(7), 1082-1111.
Ciulla, J. B., & Ciulla, J. B. (2020). The importance of leadership in shaping business values. The search for ethics in leadership, business, and beyond, 153-163.
Du, J., Li, N. N., & Luo, Y. J. (2020). Authoritarian leadership in organizational change and employees’ active reactions: Have-to and willing-to perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3076.
DuBrin, A. J. (2022). Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills. Cengage Learning.
Gumusluoglu, L., Karakitapoğlu‐Aygün, Z., & Hu, C. (2020). Angels and devils?: How do benevolent and authoritarian leaders differ in shaping ethical climate via justice perceptions across cultures?. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(2), 388-402.
Irving, J. A., & Strauss, M. L. (2019). Leadership in Christian perspective: Biblical foundations and contemporary practices for servant leaders. Baker Academic.
Justino, C. M. (2022). The Relationship Between Toxic Leadership Traits and Employee Turnover Intention Among Four Cultural Typologies (Doctoral dissertation, Touro University Worldwide).
Li, R., Chen, Z., Zhang, H., & Luo, J. (2021). How do authoritarian leadership and abusive supervision jointly thwart follower proactivity? A social control perspective. Journal of Management, 47(4), 930-956.
Mansaray, H. E. (2019). The role of leadership style in organisational change management: a literature review. Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(1), 18-31.
Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Cohen, N. (2021). Drivers of trust in emergency organizations networks: the role of readiness, threat perceptions and participation in decision making. Public Management Review, 23(2), 233-253.
Nordbäck, E. S., & Espinosa, J. A. (2019). Effective coordination of shared leadership in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 321-350.
Schermuly, C. C., & Meyer, B. (2020). Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and flow at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(5), 740-752.
Siddique, C. M., Siddique, H. F., & Siddique, S. U. (2020). Linking authoritarian leadership to employee organizational embeddedness, LMX and performance in a high-power distance culture: a mediation-moderated analysis. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(3), 393-411.
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Liu, S. (2019). Authoritarian leadership and task performance: the effects of leader-member exchange and dependence on leader. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 13, 1-15.
Wu, J., Liden, R. C., Liao, C., & Wayne, S. J. (2021). Does manager servant leadership lead to follower serving behaviors? It depends on follower self-interest. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 152.
Young, E. (2020). African American Teachers’ Perspectives on Principals’ Leadership Styles and the Influence on Teacher Morale (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina).
Zheng, Y., Graham, L., Farh, J. L., & Huang, X. (2021). The impact of authoritarian leadership on ethical voice: A moderated mediation model of felt uncertainty and leader benevolence. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 133-146.
Zheng, Y., Huang, X., Graham, L., Redman, T., & Hu, S. (2020). Deterrence effects: The role of authoritarian leadership in controlling employee workplace deviance. Management and Organization Review, 16(2), 377-404.