In recent years there has been a growing trend of people turning to so-called ‘pseudoscience’ for answers to life’s big questions. This is problematic for several reasons, not the least of which is that it often leads people astray from the evidence-based solutions that actually work. The main problem with pseudoscience is that it often provides false hope to people who are looking for answers. It offers them a quick and easy solution that does not require effort and often comes with a hefty price tag. Unfortunately, these solutions are almost always ineffective and can even be dangerous. This article discusses some of the dangers of pseudoscience and why it is such an important issue to be aware of.
What is Pseudoscience?
Pseudoscience is commonly defined as a set of beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but do not adhere to empirical evidence or scientific methods (Wilson, 2018; Afonso & Gilbert; 2010). This can include techniques based on faulty reasoning, cherry-picked data, or personal anecdotes rather than empirical evidence. Pseudoscience often relies on confirmation bias, whereby people selectively look for evidence that supports their beliefs while ignoring evidence that contradicts them (Travers et al., 2016).
Pseudoscience has been a problem throughout history, as people have used false claims of science to support their own agendas. In recent years, pseudoscience has become more prevalent due to the internet and social media (Naeem et al., 2021), which allows anyone to spread information without being held accountable for its accuracy. This can lead to people believing in false claims that have no basis in science yet can be harmful to both individuals and society.
Pseudoscience is often found in health-related claims, such as those claiming that certain supplements can cure diseases. Such claims are usually not backed by scientific evidence and can cause people to waste money on ineffective treatments or make unhealthy choices based on false information. In some cases, pseudoscience can also be dangerous.
For example, there are various “cures” for cancer that have been promoted by pseudoscientists over the years, which often involve unproven and sometimes even harmful treatments, such as laetrile (a poisonous compound made from apricot pits) and chelation therapy (a dangerous treatment used to remove heavy metals from the body). People who rely on these unproven treatments may delay or forego proven medical therapies that could save their lives.
Likewise, pseudoscience can be harmful to society by spreading misinformation and discouraging people from trusting in the scientific process. When people believe in pseudoscientific claims, it can make it harder for scientists to do their work and progress in understanding unsolved problems or developing new solutions.
Pseudoscience often relies heavily on personal testimony and anecdotal evidence rather than empirical evidence (Travers, 2017). This is because pseudoscience is not based on scientific methods; therefore, it cannot be assessed or verified using scientific methods. Personal testimony and anecdotal evidence can be easily manipulated to support any claim, no matter how far-fetched or implausible it may be.
Moreover, pseudoscience is often characterized by a lack of transparency and resistance to scientific scrutiny, making it often challenging to determine whether claims made by “pseudoscientists” are true or false. Finally, pseudoscience can be used to support dubious political or economic agendas. For example, some people use pseudoscientific arguments to downplay climate change’s seriousness.
The Historical Context of Pseudoscience
Pseudoscience has been around for years, and its effects can be seen in many different areas of society. In the past, pseudoscience was often used to justify horrific issues, such as slavery and racism. Today, pseudoscience is still used to support harmful ideas, like the false belief that approved vaccines are dangerous.
Understanding the history of pseudoscience is essential so we can be better equipped to deal with it today. Here are some examples that explore the historical context of pseudoscience. Therapeutic phlebotomy (bloodletting) is one example of pseudoscience that was once widely practiced (Shefer-Mossensohn, 2010). Although it has been debunked, some still believe in its efficacy.
Racism and slavery were justified with pseudoscience in the 18th and 19th centuries. In the US, early scientists used bogus claims about African Americans being inferior to Caucasians in order to support slavery and discrimination (Menchaca, 1997). This false science has been used to legitimize racism for centuries, causing immense harm to people of African origin around the world.
Similarly, the dark legacy of eugenics is steeped in racism, bigotry, and violence. The “science” of improving humanity through selective breeding led to the mass murder of millions of people who were deemed “undesirable” by those in power.
The eugenics movement was started by Francis Galton in the late 1800s and gained traction throughout the early 1900s. It was not until after World War II that the true horrors of eugenics were revealed when the world learned about the Nazis’ horrific extermination camps.
In America, eugenics laws led to the forced sterilization of tens of thousands of people who were considered “unfit” to reproduce (Pegoraro, 2015). Though eugenics has mainly been discredited as a science, its legacy continues to this day in the form of genetic discrimination and racial bias.
Vaccine denial is another form of pseudoscience that has gained traction in recent years. There is a lot of misinformation about vaccines and their supposed dangers. Vaccine denial is a form of pseudoscience that has gained traction in recent years, thanks partly to the internet and social media.
Anti-vaccine activists often cherry-pick data and studies to support their claims while ignoring the overwhelming scientific evidence that vaccines are safe and effective. This puts everyone at risk, lowering herd immunity and making it more likely for outbreaks of preventable diseases to occur. Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, some people continue to believe they are primarily harmful.
The Implications of Pseudoscience
Pseudoscience can have far-reaching and dangerous consequences when people rely on it to make decisions about their health, safety, finances, etc. For example, public health officials say that people delaying essential medical treatments due to false information promoted by peddlers of pseudoscience may result in death and illness (O’Connor & Weatherall, 2019; Kata, 2012). Others might believe in astrology and make important life decisions based on their “zodiac sign” rather than logic or reason.
Pseudoscience can also have adverse social effects. For instance, someone might refuse to vaccinate their child because they believe the false claim that vaccines cause autism (Dixon and Clarke, 2013). This puts not only their own child at risk but also increases the chances of an outbreak of a preventable disease. Moreover, governments spend billions of dollars on scientific research every year. We need to make sure that the money being spent is not wasted on projects that are not legitimate science.
Pseudoscience also erodes people’s trust in science and scientists. When people see that pseudoscientific ideas are promoted as being on the same level as real science, they may start to doubt the validity of scientific research altogether, possibly leading to a general mistrust of experts and an unwillingness to accept evidence-based information.
This can have far-reaching effects, as it may discourage people from taking precautions against real dangers (such as climate change) or seeking effective medical care. Further, mistrusting science may dissuade people from pursuing careers in science or participating in scientific research, which ultimately hinders our ability to make progress and advance our understanding of the world we live in.
Consequently, it is important to be critical of claims that purport to be scientific and to base our decisions on evidence-based information. False information can be refuted by counteracting it with truthful facts about the subject.
How to Spot Pseudoscience
Pseudoscience is everywhere. From the media to the internet, it is easy to find claims that something is accurate simply because it sounds good or because it is what we want to believe. But how can we tell if something is actually pseudoscience?
There are many ways to spot pseudoscience, but some common signs include: making grandiose claims without evidence, using misleading or cherry-picked data, abusing statistics, over-reliance on personal anecdotes, and using logical fallacies. For instance:
See if the claim being made is supported by evidence. It is probably pseudoscience if there is no evidence or the evidence does not support the claim. Pseudoscience arguments may sound convincing but are not based on validated science. So, next time you hear something that sounds too good to be true, do some research and see if there is evidence to back it up.
Check if the claim goes against what we know from science. If it does, then it is probably pseudoscience. For example, claims that extraterrestrial beings have visited Earth are probably pseudoscience because there is insufficient scientific evidence to support them.
Notice if the claim relies on personal testimony instead of scientific evidence. This is often the case with alternative therapies like homeopathy or acupuncture. If the only evidence for a claim is someone saying it worked for them, then it is probably pseudoscience.
Question claims that are based on ancient wisdom or traditions. There is no question that many claims are based on ancient wisdom or practices. However, it is expected that many of these claims have been debunked over time. As new information is discovered, it is often revealed that ancient wisdom was not as wise as we thought. This does not mean that all claims based on ancient wisdom are false, but it does mean that we should be critical of them.
Check references and look for peer-reviewed studies before believing any claim. It is important to check references and look for peer-reviewed studies for accurate information. Any claim that does not have reputable sources to back it up should be viewed with skepticism. In general, claims based on personal anecdotes or opinions are not as reliable as those supported by hard data.
If you encounter pseudoscience, the best thing to do is to be critical and ask questions. Try to find out if there is evidence to support the claims being made. If there is no evidence, or if the evidence is weak, the claims are probably not valid. There is a lot of misinformation out there, so it is important to be skeptical and do your own research.
Pseudoscience is a problem of public importance because of its harmful consequences for individuals and society. Identifying pseudoscience is often vital so people can make informed decisions about what to believe and do.
There are different types of pseudoscience, and some are more harmful than others. For example, quackery is a type of pseudoscience that often leads people to waste money on useless products or treatments. In other cases, pseudoscience can lead people to believe false claims about health or the environment. This can have dangerous consequences if people base their decisions on these false beliefs.
Overall, it is crucial to be critical when evaluating claims about health, the environment, and other topics. If something seems too good to be true, it probably is. Checking with experts and researching can help you sort out the facts from the fiction.
Afonso, A. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). Pseudo‐Science: A Meaningful Context for Assessing Nature of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 329-348.
Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013). Heightening Uncertainty Around Certain Science: Media Coverage, False Balance, And the Autism-Vaccine Controversy. Science Communication, 35(3), 358-382.
Kata, A. (2012). Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, And the Postmodern Paradigm–An Overview of Tactics and Tropes Used Online by The Anti-Vaccination Movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778-3789.
Menchaca, M. (1997). Early Racist Discourses: The Roots of Deficit Thinking. The Evolution of Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice, 13-40.
Naeem, S. B., Bhatti, R., & Khan, A. (2021). An Exploration of How Fake News Is Taking Over Social Media and Putting Public Health at Risk. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38(2), 143-149.
O’Connor, C., & Weatherall, J. O. (2019). The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Pegoraro, L. (2015). Second-Rate Victims: The Forced Sterilization of Indigenous Peoples in The USA And Canada. Settler Colonial Studies, 5(2), 161-173.
Shefer-Mossensohn, M. (2010). Ottoman Medicine: Healing and Medical Institutions, 1500-1700. New York: SUNY Press.
Travers, J. C. (2017). Evaluating Claims to Avoid Pseudoscientific and Unproven Practices in Special Education. Intervention In School and Clinic, 52(4), 195-203.
Travers, J., Ayers, K., Simpson, R., & Crutchfield, S. (2016). Fad, Pseudoscientific, And Controversial Interventions (Pp. 257-293). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Wilson, J. A. (2018). Reducing Pseudoscientific and Paranormal Beliefs in University Students Through a Course in Science and Critical Thinking. Science & Education, 27(1), 183-210.